Back to Posts
Jun 29, 2015

Comfortably Uncomfortable: The Challenge of Evangelization

Mark Hart

I’ve often wondered if St. Paul would have been happier just opening a Bed-n-Breakfast outside of Jerusalem. Picture it, Paul could have just received visitors into the warmth and safety of his own home, encouraging wayward souls and sharing his experiences of Christ and His unyielding love… but he didn’t.

Why not?

I mean, it would have yielded fruit, to be sure, for every pilgrim who visited Paul’s Damascus Dream Resort & Spa. It would have grown the Church… far slower, but still. It would have been a safe, tidy, noble and, possibly even, profitable venture for an out-of-work rabbi looking to make ends meet.

So, why not?

Why didn’t Paul opt for the safer and easier way? Probably because safe and easy just aren’t the gospel. Had he done so, one wonders if we’d refer to him as “St.” Paul at all! Would we still celebrate him on two separate feast days? Would his legacy still be commemorated at St. Paul Outside the Walls, Rome’s basilica that bears far more than his name, but also his passion-filled legacy?

What if Peter Just Kept Fishing for Fish?

And what of St. Peter? Do you ever wonder if our first Pontiff ever just thought, “I’d rather (still) be fishing” during one of his stints in prison or while presiding over any early councils or summits? What propelled him forward to make political waves in Rome when he may have wanted, quite simply, just to return to the waves of Galilee? Why would he put up with the headaches and the stress and the danger day in day out? Why didn’t St. Peter just hand back “the keys” a few years after Pentecost?

Sts Peter and Paul

Simply put, what was Sts. Peter’s and Paul’s secret, anyway?

Did they have more access to God’s grace than we do? Assuredly not. St. Peter may have been at the Last Supper, but we enjoy the same Eucharistic “access.” As we see in 1 Corinthians 11:20-29, too, St. Paul partook in the same Eucharistic sacrifice that we enjoy at every Mass.

Did he just have greater humility? Possibly. Many of us can only aspire to the type of humility shown by these great evangelists (see 1 Peter 5:6, 1 Corinthians 15:9). That being said, these two theological giants didn’t necessarily “start out” all that humble. Both Simon and Saul (Peter and Paul) were, like us, works in progress.

Were Sts. Peter and Paul just fearless? While they did find a way to survive multiple incarcerations (see Acts 5, 12 and 16) and brushes with death preceding their own martyrdoms (see 2 Corinthians 11:23-29), their “luck” was actually God’s grace and it’s not that they were fearless. They just refused to let fear direct their mission.

We Have the Same Graces as Peter & Paul!

Peter and Paul weren’t lacking in eucharistic grace, nor humility, nor courage… and neither are we. But, this still doesn’t fully answer what kept them moving forward when others quit. What kept them proclaiming the truth of Christ and the greatness of God even in the face of personal suffering and persecution?

I think their “secret” was relationship. It was St. Peter’s and St. Paul’s relationship with Jesus Christ – living and active – that left them unable to sit still, unable to keep quiet (Tweet this). It was their daily prayer and intimacy with Jesus that fueled the passion to evangelize the world.

Is that the case with you and I?

We have the God of the universe available upon our altars, residing in our chapels and dwelling in our hearts. Do our neighbors know it? No, not just the Catholic ones… I’m talking about the fallen-away Catholics, the agnostics, the self-proclaimed atheists, and every denomination, religion, and belief system that falls in between. Do those you share your life with know the source of your life, despite persecution?

Yes, St. Francis “preached the gospel and used words when necessary” but few of us – if any – are currently as holy as St. Francis. My point is not that we need to beat people over the head with the gospel, far from it. Many souls need time for their hearts to be opened. That being said, at times, I’ve also used that quote from St. Francis to let myself off the hook because I was fearful to really share the gospel or was afraid of how an interaction or conversation might go. The point is, we need to use words most of the time! Yes, the gospel is shared in silent witness but the Church was built on the vocal witness of His followers.

We can never forget that fear is not the gospel… it’s the anti-gospel. What does our Lord constantly remind us? “Do not fear!” (Mt 28:10; Mk 4:40, Lk 5:10, Jn 6:20)

We are not sharing a “system of beliefs,” a doctrine or a philosophy, we are sharing truth and beauty and mercy. We are not introducing bodies to a Creator, but souls to their Savior. We are a Church made not of bricks, but of sinners seeking salvation.

As Pope Francis reminded us, we are part “of a love story.”

Those souls who “take issue with religion” are often shocked to find out that the very etymology of the word “religion” stems from the word “relationship;” it was by way of our religion that our relationship with God – and one another – found its proper and glorious context.

What is Our Mission?

So I ask you the same question I ask myself: How far am I willing to go for others’ salvation and true joy?

If you want something you’ve never had, are you willing to do something you’ve never done? If not, are you truly open to the Holy Spirit or are you telling the Lord when and how and where His Holy Spirit is allowed to move?

Our Savior, Jesus, the God of the Universe, bid us to be “fishers of men,” not keepers of the aquarium!

If you and I want to live as Christians we better soon embrace this universal, gospel truth: get comfortable with being uncomfortable.

Sharing Christ is the only true gift we can give another. Everything else fades, breaks, dies, or distracts. God alone remains.


You may also like…

Four Sides of the Same Coin: When the Gospels Disagree
Acts 2: Rush of a Might Wind
Paul’s Hymn of Glory

 

Get your favorite Ascension content sent right to your email!

  • Thank you for this affirming article…For a very long time now, I have been challenged by the works of Sts. Peter and Paul…A popular phrase that I have heard in recent years along these same lines is to “live life out loud”…Quite a challenge for us! Another word that I love is “Communion”…(with union)…in this case Union with Jesus…To be in the mindset that I will be, as Mother Teresa would say, Jesus to others; just as they are Jesus to me challenges us to watch for signs of His presence in and among us all…This can be very challenging, especially when you are not in the habit of doing so…Slowly over the course of many years, I am finding Him…Again thank you for showing me that I am on the right path…the path that those who have come before us have modeled…They are our teachers…they are God’s people who have lived lives “out loud”…

  • The big challenge of our faith and our existence came with the U.S. Supreme Court decision last Friday with the approval of same-sex marriage affecting not only in the United States but all believers worldwide. The challenge for us is how are we going to move on with our lives with this secularist move by the highest court of the US whose duties were to protect the people through their solemn pledge to the Bible. It is unthinkable that the Bible truth have been seriously perverted by this very people who put their duties and their lives by God’s grace in their individual sworn statements in holding their offices in the Bible. Beginning today the Bible cannot be anymore relevant to the discharge of their duties in the U.S. Judiciary and hence there should be no more Bible to officiate any government officials in the United states on both Federal and State levels. The five justices who approve same-sex marriage in court all of what the had sworn to uphold truth of the Bible, so we could imagine furious eyes of God on them, that the flaming double-bladed sword of God were directly pointed toward their hearts.

    The dissenters accused their colleagues of usurping power that belongs to the states and to voters, and short-circuiting a national debate about same-sex marriage. “This court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in dissent.

    My point here is, why no knowledgeable attorney can dispute and invalidate the apparent encroachment into the dmain of legislative function by the seoarate and co-equal function of the judiciary? The fact is clearly admitted by the Chief Justice, John Roberts. In the same circumstance is in the Roe vs. Wade, the case on abortion? Why? Why? and Why? Surely, it violates the sovereign power of the people, is’ it?? John Roberts legally declared that the Court is not its concern, so its tantamount to lacking its jurisdiction. The US Supreme Court have seriously made a big mockery of God’s truth in the Bible and thwarting the Constitution of the United States. I wonder if the matter is in fact, the Court have decreed also void from the beginning? Some lawyers out there ought to explain this to us lay.

  • This topic reminds me of how important it is it “Let Go and Let God” move within me instead of me trying to lead on my own. Over the past two years I have improved towards evangelization. My growth has come through daily scripture and falling in love with my Catholic faith. Thank you for sharing.

  • >