Back to Posts
May 11, 2020

What Many People Miss about Jacob’s Stolen Blessing

Isabella Bruno

There are few biblical stories that vex me more than that of Jacob stealing his brother Esau’s blessing. I’m sure I’m not alone. Our human sensibilities naturally balk at this kind of blatant miscarriage of justice. Surely, God wouldn’t be condoning such deceitful behavior, would he? So what’s really going on here? 

Isaac, aged and preparing for the end of his life, sends his eldest son, Esau, out to the field to hunt game. When he returns, Esau is to prepare a meal for Isaac with his catch, after which Isaac will bestow upon Esau his blessing.

It seems a simple enough plan—but there’s a twist. Eavesdropping nearby is Rebekah, Isaac’s wife, who, after Esau departs, encourages her younger son Jacob to impersonate his brother. Concerned that the charade might be discovered by his father, Jacob at first protests. “Perhaps … I shall seem to be mocking him, and bring a curse upon myself and not a blessing” (Genesis 27:12). But Rebekah assures him, “Upon me be your curse, my son; only obey my word” (Genesis 27:13).

Now convinced, Jacob goes along with her plan, donning Esau’s clothing and covering his smooth skin with the hides of kids to better resemble his hairy sibling. When Jacob enters Isaac’s room, bearing the dish that Rebekah had prepared, Isaac feels Jacob’s hands and breathes in the scent of Esau, which still clings to his clothing. Though he recognizes Jacob’s voice, Isaac is persuaded by the other proofs and, believing Jacob to be Esau, Isaac unintentionally blesses him instead. Worse still, when Esau returns to his father and his mistake is revealed, Isaac laments that his blessing cannot be revoked, but will remain on Jacob.

A Change in Perspective

From the perspective of human justice, this story is deeply unsettling. Why was Jacob allowed to benefit from his father’s blessing, even after his deceit was discovered? Why was Isaac’s blessing not nullified in light of Jacob’s duplicity? On an earthly level, the entire ordeal can easily be written off as profoundly unjust.

Imagine my surprise, then, when I happened upon a passage from St. Louis de Montfort’s spiritual classic, True Devotion to Mary. Speaking of Mary’s devotees, he writes:

“[God the Father] eats with joy of what Mary their Mother has dressed for Him, recognising in them the merits and good odor of His Son and of His Holy Mother.”

Montfort 95

Boom! Like a bolt of lightning, the pieces to this puzzle suddenly fell into place. Of course, this story is unjust. Of course, Isaac’s blessing would remain forever. And thanks be to God for that! For Jacob lives in each and every one of us.

Motherly Intervention

On our own, none of us can merit God’s blessing or claim it as our due. We have all fallen short of the perfection demanded of us (Matthew 5:48). We are all without wedding garments (Matthew 22:12). Like Jacob, we all might honestly tremble at the thought of approaching God, worried that he might recognize us as sinners and refuse us his blessing.

Thankfully, God does not leave us alone in our nakedness, but instead offers us the consolation of Mary, his mother. After being stripped of his garments and nailed to the Cross, Jesus calls down to John, “Behold your mother” (John 19:27), entrusting Mary not only to his disciple, but also to the Church, and by extension, all its members.

Mary thus has a unique role in our salvation, and when we entrust ourselves to her, she immediately begins the work of preparing us to approach our heavenly father, caring for us as Rebekah did Jacob.

Rebekah as a Type of Mary

As Rebekah cleaned and prepared the kids, cooking a meal that was pleasing to Isaac, so Mary, “cleanses [us] of [our] spots, [our] vileness, [our] sins… she dresses [us] to the taste of God, and to His greater glory” (Montfort 94). As Rebekah clothed Jacob in the clothing of Esau, so Mary, “clothes us in the clean, new, precious, and perfumed garments of… Jesus Christ her Son” (Montfort 94).

What’s more, in an outpouring of generosity, Mary exceeds the actions of Rebekah and adorns us not only with the garments of her son, but also with her very own garments:

“Thus all her domestics, faithful servants and slaves, are doubly clad in the garments of her Son and in her own.”

Montfort 95

Because of this, we need not fear to approach God the Father. Even though we have no claim to his blessing, because of the action and merit of Jesus and Mary, it is granted.

Have Recourse to Mary

On the first of May, our bishops entrusted Canada and the United States to Mary in a collective act of consecration. During this month dedicated to Our Lady, may we also draw near to the mother of God and implore her help and intercession, knowing that as we do, she is already at work preparing us to approach our heavenly father.

One prayer that I like to recite daily is a short consecration to Mary, indulgenced by Pope Pius IX when said with a Hail Mary:

O Mary, my queen, my mother, I give myself entirely to thee, and to show my devotion to thee, I consecrate to thee this day my eyes, my ears, my mouth, my heart, my whole being without reserve. Wherefore, good mother, as I am thine own, keep me, guard me as thy property and possession. Amen.

Draw near with humble hearts open to Mary’s maternal guidance. And when we do, we can rest assured that she will act and that our heavenly father, enticed by the odor of his son and his son’s mother, will surely echo Isaac’s cry:

“See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord has blessed!”

Genesis 27:27

You May Also Like:

How to Pray Like Mary [Book]

Scripture & Tradition: From Jewish Roots

A Faith Life with No Regrets [Bobby Angel video]

10 Bible Verses on Fear [Jeff Cavins podcast]

Isabella Bruno is a Catholic writer, blogger, and speaker who is head-over-heels in love with the Catholic Faith. You can find her online at, where she shares inspirational love stories, highlights people pursuing their passions, and opens up about her own journey to love.

Featured painting, “Isaac Blessing Jacob” (1638) by Govert Flinck sourced from Wikimedia Commons

Has Ascension's free media strengthened your faith?
You can now offer ongoing support for this content with a recurring gift.
Support Ascension

Get your favorite Ascension content sent right to your email!

  • Wow. I will never look at this Bible story the same way again. Though there are many examples of misdeeds in the Old Testament, including this one, your article is a reminder that they all are, in some way, a foreshadowing of something greater or a lesson for us to learn from. This story, I now see, is both. Thanks so much!

    • You’re very welcome, Jeannette! I’m so glad that this article has helped you in your faith journey 🙂

  • This article really sounds like Mary is dressing people up to deceive God, since the comparison is to Rebecca dressing up Jacob to deceive Isaac.

  • I’m sorry, but how is this not blasphemous to put Mary on par with Jesus? Where does the Bible support the idea that Mary can somehow cleanse us of sin? I am asking sincerely, I don’t get it.

    • Heather and Seeking,

      Thank you both for your comments and questions. I’ll do my best to provide some insight, although the whole of Marian theology is far beyond the scope of a simple article or comment response!

      To respond to Seeking’s point, DeMontfort certainly isn’t suggesting that Mary is able to somehow deceive God. He’s God, after all – he already knows everything! What DeMontfort is saying is that Rebekah is an Old Testament “type” of Mary. Types are simply symbols or figures that foreshadow something to do with the saving action of Jesus. For example, the sacrifice of the Passover Lamb foreshadows Jesus’ sacrifice on the Cross. The Ark of the Covenant prefigures Mary, who is the Ark of the New Covenant, i.e. Jesus himself. So in this particular incident, Rebekah’s action of intercession for her son prefigures Mary’s intercessory action for us, her beloved children. But while it is true that we can learn something about Mary’s mediation with Jesus through this episode, it’s not the case that Mary behaves in exactly the same way as Rebekah.

      To respond to your query about blasphemy, Heather, let’s first look at the wedding feast at Cana (John 2) in order to get a better look at Mary’s interaction with God. While at the feast, Mary points out to Jesus that the couple has no more wine. She sees their need and intercedes for them, bringing their troubles to her Son. While Jesus was not yet intending to manifest himself to the world and thus begin the three-year journey to the Cross, he nevertheless yields to his mother’s request out of love for her and performs his first public miracle.

      Now, since Mary was “full of grace” and living a life of consistent, humble, and loving conformity to God’s will, we can rest assured that this exchange wasn’t a tug-of-war or an argument. It was simply Mary making a request of her Son for the sake of another needy person. Had he refused her, Mary surely would have accepted his will. But because of his great love for her, Jesus chooses to grant her request. For the same reason, the Holy Spirit, Mary’s heavenly Spouse, inspired St. John to include this event in his Gospel.

      Of course, no one would dare to say that Mary herself brought the miracle about by her own power. That kind of action is clearly reserved for God alone. Mary is not equal to God. But she is favored by God. As such, Jesus is particularly receptive to his mother’s pleas – not because she is powerful by and of herself, and not because she changes his mind as though God’s will can be influenced by mere man. But God responds to her in this way in order to encourage us, his faithful, to favor Mary as much as he does, to look to her for guidance, and to offer her our prayers which she in turn presents to him.

      This idea is the basis of Marian Consecration, the practice that St. Louis de Montfort wrote about in his book (and the source of my article’s quotes), “True Devotion to Mary.” He isn’t putting Mary on par with God, and he’s not suggesting that she stands in opposition to him. With regard to this particular example of Isaac and Rebekah, he is offering a comparison in order to better explain Mary’s response to a needy soul. We by and of ourselves have no merits to plead our case. We are all sinners before Christ. We are allowed to take on his name in Baptism, and it is his sacrifice alone that provides us with the merits we need to be found justified before him. However, the vessel through whom God chooses to dispense this grace is none other than the Blessed Mother. This is why she is called the Mediatrix of Grace. We receive Jesus’ merits, but we receive them through her. And, if we consecrate ourselves to her à la DeMontfort’s recommendation, she also clothes us with her own merits and graces – all of which come from God.

      “True Devotion to Mary” outlines this Marian theology in much greater detail, although it is a bit dense and so can be difficult to read. If you’re interested in learning more about Marian theology and/or consecration, “33 Days to Morning Glory” by Fr. Michael Gaitley provides a simplified approach to DeMontfort’s consecration. Venerable Fulton Sheen’s “The World’s First Love” is entirely devoted to Marian theology. And his “Life of Christ” provides far more insight on the wedding feast at Cana than a simple comment response will allow.

      I sincerely hope this answers some of your questions. Thanks again for your comments. God bless!

  • >